<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boo hiss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steppingonlegos.com/2006/03/30/boo-hiss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steppingonlegos.com/2006/03/30/boo-hiss/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Life, Love and Laundry</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicki</title>
		<link>http://www.steppingonlegos.com/2006/03/30/boo-hiss/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steppingonlegos.com/2006/03/30/boo-hiss/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Right - two unrelated siblings are considered two completely separate adoptions. Really on different than going through the process twice except you don't have to travel twice. Two siblings would be considered ONE adoption, so you would only need ONE dossier for the "group", one G&#38;R, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right - two unrelated siblings are considered two completely separate adoptions. Really on different than going through the process twice except you don&#8217;t have to travel twice. Two siblings would be considered ONE adoption, so you would only need ONE dossier for the &#8220;group&#8221;, one G&amp;R, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole and Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.steppingonlegos.com/2006/03/30/boo-hiss/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole and Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steppingonlegos.com/2006/03/30/boo-hiss/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it makes sense.  I guess it would be more difficult to place two kids that can't be placed seperatly, so the fees would be lower.  You know what I mean?  Siblings need to be placed together but non-related kids are usually placed in different families that pay seperate fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it makes sense.  I guess it would be more difficult to place two kids that can&#8217;t be placed seperatly, so the fees would be lower.  You know what I mean?  Siblings need to be placed together but non-related kids are usually placed in different families that pay seperate fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.steppingonlegos.com/2006/03/30/boo-hiss/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steppingonlegos.com/2006/03/30/boo-hiss/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Wait... so it costs almost twice as much for 2 unrelated kids, but not twice as much if the children are siblings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230; so it costs almost twice as much for 2 unrelated kids, but not twice as much if the children are siblings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
